The topic that I want to research is immigration reform. This is a hot-button issue not only in the United States, but throughout the entire World. I would like to research different country's immigration policies and see how they compare.
Democratic Inclusion and the Governance of Immigration
Lampert, Joseph, joseph.lampert@pdx.edu. "Democratic Inclusion And The Governance Of Immigration." Social Theory & Practice 41.1 (2015): 51-76. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 26 Feb. 2015
This
article examines two very popular views on immigration policy.
The two views that Joseph Lampert addresses in his essay are "The
All-Affected Interests Principle" and "Democratic Inclusion." This
peer-reviewed, scholarly article gives readers a perspective on
immigration from two unique points of view. He has various acclaimed
sources that feel that the current democratic governance of immigration
excludes the interests of groups of people. There are many more sources
that go on to discuss changes that should be made to immigration and the
possible implications. Joseph Lampert is a Political Science professor
at Portland State University and he focuses the majority of his research
on democratic theory. Social-Liberal.
Bugaj, Agnieszka1. "Gangs Of The United States And The European Union: Developments In Immigration Restrictions." Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 23.2 (2014): 401-424. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 26 Feb. 2015.
This article shows the restrictions on immigration that being made by the United States and countries in the European Union. Agnieszka Bugaj, writes about the history of gang violence in these areas and the correlation
it has with immigration. He uses real examples of action that the
United States and European Union are taking to regulate immigration in
order to maintain national security. He compares and contrasts the
polices of each of the countries and shows what is useful and what is
not. Agnieszka Bugaj is a graduate from the University of Iowa College of Law and wrote this article as a contribution to the Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems. Social-Conservative.
Bugaj, Agnieszka1. "Gangs Of The United States And The European Union: Developments In Immigration Restrictions." Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 23.2 (2014): 401-424. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 26 Feb. 2015.
This article takes a look at Immigration Federalism in Canada and Australia. Sasha Baglay
and Delphine Nakache conduct research to find out how effective the
their immigration systems really are and how the immigrants benefit from
their new home. After executing the case studies, they uses their data
to compare the immigration policies of the two counties. The divisions
of power in each country see different effects from immigration. The
study shows the impact immigration has on businesses and the economy.
Dr. Sasha Baglay is a professor at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology and focuses her studies on comparative immigration. Delphine Nakache, an International Studies professor at the University of Ottawa collaborated with her in this project. Social-Conservative.
Do Anti-immigration Parties Matter? The Case of the Sweden Democrats and Local Refugee Policy
Baglay, Sasha, and Delphine Nakache. "The Implications Of Immigration
Federalism For Non-Citizens’ Rights And Immigration Opportunities:
Canada And Australia Compared." American Review Of Canadian Studies 43.3 (2013): 334-357. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
The purpose of this article is to take a look at the rising popularity of anti-immigration political parties in Sweden. Swedish scholars set out to find out if these parties actually have an impact on their country's immigration policies. They first take a look at the data from past studies and form a hypothesis for their new study. By looking at the number of members of elected officials with affiliation to this party and the results of immigration laws they are able to draw conclusions on the party's impact. Niklas Bolin, a Political Science Professor at Mid Sweden University was a big contributor to this study. Gustav Lidén and Jon Nyhlén are colleagues of Bolin and also helped conduct research for the article. Social-Conservative.
The purpose of this article is to take a look at the rising popularity of anti-immigration political parties in Sweden. Swedish scholars set out to find out if these parties actually have an impact on their country's immigration policies. They first take a look at the data from past studies and form a hypothesis for their new study. By looking at the number of members of elected officials with affiliation to this party and the results of immigration laws they are able to draw conclusions on the party's impact. Niklas Bolin, a Political Science Professor at Mid Sweden University was a big contributor to this study. Gustav Lidén and Jon Nyhlén are colleagues of Bolin and also helped conduct research for the article. Social-Conservative.
Green, David6, Ari Shapiro, and
Robert Acker. "Refugees Find A Closing Of Sweden's Open-Door Immigration
Policy." NPR. NPR, 6 Feb. 2015. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
This
source is a manuscript from a news report on NPR. I was listening to this
segment at work a few weeks back and it really caught my attention. For decades
Sweden has had an open door policy regarding immigration into their country.
They have accepted refugees from other countries such as citizens from Middle
Eastern countries. In recent years, a political party has arose in Sweden that
is strongly against accepting refugees. In this interview, Ari Shapiro talks
with Robert Acker. Acker is a professional basketball player in Sweden who
immigrated to Sweden at a young age. He
explains the changes that have taken place in Sweden’s immigration policy
throughout the time he has lived there. This is a good source to get a current
perspective on this policy. Social-Conservative.
Group Size Versus Change? Assessing Americans' Perception of Local Immigration.
Newman, Benjamin J., and Yamil Velez. "Group Size Versus Change? Assessing Americans' Perception Of Local Immigration." Political Research Quarterly 67.2 (2014): 294-303. Political Science Complete. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
This article takes a look at the
trend of immigration in the United States. Benjamin Newman and Yamil Velez
conduct research to predict the growth of immigration over the next few years.
They use statistics to form a hypothesis for the growth of immigration to the
United States. The numbers are broken down into ethnic groups. This shows the
potential growth for each immigrant group in the United States in the future.
This study is helpful because it can help prevent future problems with
immigration if progressive action is taken. Benjamin Newman is a professor at
the University of Connecticut at Stamford and Yamil Velez teaches at Stony
Brook University. Social-Conservative.
Jupp, J. (2014), IMMIGRATION
POLICYMAKING IN THE GLOBAL ERA - by Natasha T. Duncan and LIBERAL STATES AND
THE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT - by Steffen Mau , Heike Brabandt, Lena Laube and
Christof Roos. Public Administration, 92: 248–251. Web. 27 Feb. 2015
This
is another article that conducts research on immigration. However, this is a
more liberal point of view. They take a look at immigration polices throughout
history and determine which ones are useful and which ones are not as useful. They
take a look from the perspective of the minority. In this case it is the
immigrants affected by immigration policy. This is an important source because
in order to present your side of an issue, you must understand the opposing
viewpoint. This helps create credibility and understanding. The research was conducted
by Dr. James Jupp, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Social-Liberal.
Immigration Reform: Where Were You Born?
Since the beginning of time, humans have been traveling the World for various reasons. Human nature demands that people move and interact with one another in order to grow and improve. Different cultures, ideas, and innovations have been created due to immigration. The U.S. is a country founded by immigrants.A Look at Immigration Policy in the United States of America
The question was simple, “How many immigrants live in your area?” The study had four response choices that ranged from (1) “Many” (2) “Some” (3) “Only a Few” (4) “None”. According to Newman and Velez’s study, “The results in panel A reveal that whites residing in counties experiencing high growth in the immigration population were significantly more likely to report the highest level of perceived recent immigration into their local area” (Newman 297). This is a breakthrough study on immigration because it takes a look at the views of the citizens and the impact that this issues has on American society. The study proved that many Americans described their neighbors as immigrants, even though they themselves were proven descendants of immigrants. People tend to think of immigrants as people who look different than themselves in aspects such as skin color, height, or weight, and people who practice different cultural traditions such as language, religion, and ideology. It also provides a depiction for the demand that the United States has for new immigrants. James Jupp, a Political Science Professor at the University of Texas at Austin uses the market economy law of supply and demand and relates it to immigration policy in his journal Policy Making in the Global Era when he writes:
There is a qualitative and a quantitative dimension to demand. "The focus on quantity of potential and actual migrants is mainly a response to national or international urbanization and industrial demand for labor and skills. The quality of migrants is often subjective and can be controlled more effectively than their quantity or origins. The assessment of quality may be based on such issues as ethnicity, religion, language, historic ties, race, and public opinion. While economists, accountants, and lawyers may measure and advise on quantity, it is often politicians and journalists who have most say in influencing quality. The disciplines of economics and demography may be less important than sociology, history, and political science, when quality is in question" (Jupp 248). Overall, the main point to be understood from this description of quantity versus quality is that immigrant workers may be necessary in America for jobs that Americans do not wish to perform. Immigrants are notably cheaper than American workers who require state and federal wages, and often times work extremely hard in their trade in comparison to "lazy" American workers.
The
American Industrial Revolution in the 19th Century created a high
demand for immigrant workers. Immigrants began flocking to the United
States from all over the world in search of freedom and opportunity.
These people began to settle all over America and started families and
laid down foundations. However, there were many hardships for these
people as they fell victim to discrimination. This is an issue that is
present in many societies. At the turn of the century, many of these
oppressed immigrants began forming political and social groups that
demanded equal rights and opportunities for all. The 20th century gave
way to many "far left" movements. This is essentially, a way of thinking
that holds true to the belief that all people should be treated
equally. Some influential movements such as the Civil Rights Movement,
Women's Rights Movement, and Gay rights movement emerged during this
time. Since then, Americans have been striving toward become a more
unified nation that does not judge people based on their race, color,
ethnicity or anything else that may alienate someone.
South Park: A Look at the Division of people due to Immigration
This video clip in the link above is from an episode of South Park and takes a satirical look at the controversy that is currently taking place on the issue of immigration reform. This displays how irrational people who disagree with one another can be. It is useful to show political issues in popular media such as South Park because it reaches audiences that usually do not keep themselves informed on issues. Being able to laugh at the situation is a good first step to eliminate tensions and work toward a compromise.Immigration Reform in European Union
New policies within the country of Sweden are developing regarding the notion of immigration. Sweden residents claim that new Muslim immigrants do not acclimate as well as previous generations; therefore, a new party has been formed to put a stop to immigration into Sweden. The citizens of Sweden believe that they are acting in their own best interest, but this is not true. Immigration is necessary to further the development of intellectual thinking and any thinking opposite to this compares closely to that of a Nazi in Germany during World War II. It is extremely narrow thinking to believe that any certain group of people is better than another; therefore, it logically makes sense that immigration leads to an improvement in society by sharing knowledge and different cultural practices. This issue was first brought to my attention in an interview that Ari Shapiro of NPR news had with Robert Acker, a first generation immigrant in Sweden and a professional basketball player. Acker sheds light on recent proceedings and Shapiro reports this when he says, "He thinks recent Muslim immigrants are not integrating as well as earlier generations of arrivals. And now a political party that wants to cut immigration to Sweden by 90 percent is booming. We're standing in a neighborhood that is a center of support for that party. Acker says the Sweden Democrats seem to want to get rid of all immigrants, integrated or not" (Shapiro). Restricting immigration implies the idea that the native people are inherently better than those incoming from foreign lands. This bring a lot of social tension and division between different ethnic groups in Sweden. This could prove to be detrimental to the state of their nation because it is causing division amongst the people, rather than peace and unity.
I was mindlessly scrolling through my Instagram feed the other day and I stumbled across the picture in the link above. This picture and caption really gave me a good perspective on the fact that all countries rely heavily on immigrants and imported goods. The logic professed in the caption of this photo from the Instagram account @enligten_the_ spirit that really provoked my interest was when the contributor posted,
"Your
car is German. Your vodka is Russian. Your pizza is Italian. Your kebab
is Turkish. Your democracy is Greek. Your coffee is Brazilian. Your
movies are American. Your tea is Tamil. Your shirt is Indian. Your oil
is Saudi Arabian. Your electronics are Chinese. Your numbers Arabic,
your letters Latin. And you complain that your neighbor is an immigrant?
Pull yourself together."
Preach Joel. Immigration has allowed our country to be what it is today. I agree that immigration has definitely helped build this country, making it a place of diversity and opportunity. It allows for an exchange and sharing of cultures. Many immigrants have come to America in order to escape political turmoil or other hardships in order to build better lives for themselves. Their right to become a citizen gives people who come from suppressed countries a chance to experience the same prosperity those of us who were fortunate enough to be born here have. Cultural diversity is a beautiful thing and I think we should be grateful for it. Although you probably could have touched on some of the cons that come with immigration, I think your blog really emphasized the good that immigration provides.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to see a different perspective from a different country, and how they are responding to immigration with a contrasting religion to theirs. But are the Muslims all coming from the same place? With that people group being a religious group they could be coming from the US or from England. But cutting off all immigration, even legal, has other benefits to a small country other than simplicity with their religious factions right? Population density is something that, I imagine, is strongly effected with immigration, and you mentioned economic hardships at the beginning, so would it be safe to say that cutting off immigration is NOT due to religious difference alone? I'm unsure of your stance on the topic, are you for or against immigration into the USA? And if you are for or against it, are you against all immigration or just illegal immigration? I do not think that the US should shut our gates to legal immigrants or refugees from Mexico or other Southern countries, because if we have to ability to aid, we should. In addition to that, better control of stopping illegal immigrants is a no brainer that it needs to be controlled much more than it is now. There were significant portions of the post that were pretty difficult to follow because the quotes didn't end or it was unclear where the quotes started and ended or even who said them. And with the fonts being different sizes I wasn't sure which sections were important or not.
ReplyDelete